Archive for January, 2008

Yogurt: The Most Underrated Food in the World

Wednesday, January 30th, 2008

 yogurt.jpg

Yogurt, yoghurt or whatever ‘foreigners’ want to call it - was originally invented in Turkey and named Yoğurt (after the word Yoğun, meaning dense). Of course this makes sense when you realize that yogurt is strictly milk undergoing chemical change through bacteria and becoming a more dense substance. Anyways, you might be wondering why in the world I am writing about something so ‘insignificant’ as yoğurt? Well, that attitude is the exact reason why. Today, yoğurt is (non)officially the most underrated food in the world.

You might wonder how I came to this conclusion, and there is actually two elements to it, the first one being how it is so strictly underused in most parts of the world. Yoğurt is great. No, its not just great, its freaking unbelievably amazing. I can’t believe that something as great as yoğurt exists in our world governed by laws of physics and science. Yoğurt is one of the only foods that you can include in any meal that will actually add value to your meal. Personally, I put yoğurt in practically everything that I eat. From spagetthi to rice to any meats to vegetables to really almost anything. Of course it is widely used in breakfasts, and can also function as your healthy desert. Alot of drinks are available from smoothies, to Yop, to drinks like Ayran. Yes, whether your realize it or not, yoğurt is everywhere, everyday.

Couple of eyebrows might have been raised at my use of yoğurt in main meals. In fact I was eating at a company canteen in China couple of months ago, when I had the too-good-to-be-true idea to add the yoğurt provided as a drink to the sticky dull rice that I generally find too dry to eat. Horror and shock was seen all across the cafeteria as I covered their holy rice with yoğurt – almost as if my meal would explode at these two unrelated foods combining. Well, in the end it didnt quite work out the way I had envisioned as the yoğurt was completely sweet. I ended up not eating any of it and ended up hungry, and probably moronic in the eyes of my colleagues. But trust me when I say that you really should try to combine non-sweet yoğurt with other meals. It somehow manages to make the meal more lively, balances out the food your eating to hide its flaws and complement its positive taste, and makes almost any food edible (really hot, really cold, spicy, too strong taste, too weak taste, too weird taste). Oh and it doesnt hurt that its damn healthy too.

While I can insist on how great it is to combine yoğurt in a variety of meals, most will probably be too narrow minded to give it a try. One good introduction point might be to try out this meal called Iskender. This is my favorite meal in the world and if you try it you will see many valuable aspects of yoğurt you might have never noticed before. Adding garlic to yoğurt also produces great results, but that might be a refined taste not many people are ready for. 

So besides being this perfectly healthy, cheap, and widely usable food that improves practically any meal you eat – the second aspect that makes yoğurt the most underrated edible substance in the world is that in a land of 1.5 billion people, it is almost impossible to find. I have been living in China for 9 months now, and I naturally couldn’t help noticing the fact that natural yoğurt(no sweeteners, fruits, or any modifications) is not produced or ever consumed in China. Yes there are some imported ones from Japan, but they are priced like its some luxury product like caviar or something. This is a basic dairy product for God’s sake! Its not that China doesnt eat yogurt, they are in fact obsessed with it themselves and have aisles of different yoğurt.  Unfortunately, they have all been infested with chemicals, sugar, sweeteners, and fruit. In the end, someone like me who wishes to eat regular yoğurt on a consistent basis is unable to do so without spending a fortune getting ripped off by foreign imports.

I have had discussions on this topic with a few people and I just couldn’t understand how this was ethically, humanly, and economically possible. One argument thrown at me was this thing called ‘supply and demand’…pshh, like some economic jargon was the answer I was looking for! On a serious note, I don’t understand why supply and demand would lead to this situation. Prices rise or fall when there is a discrepancy between supply and demand. However, here there is perhaps low demand but actually no supply! I reasoned that some Chinese company producing sweetened yogurt could easily make changes to their production process, and gain a monopoly in the natural yoğurt market. With the fierce competition seen in the sweetened yoğurt market, I really don’t see why this isn’t viable. Besides Turks like me, there are lots of Japanese/French and other foreigners who I imagine would like to have access to plain yoğurt below champagne prices. So I was told that I should start my own company and take advantage of this bottleneck in the market. Then, yesterday afternoon, I came across this. Fresh yoğurt delivered right to your door at decent prices! As great as this solution was, the price still seemed too high for me  – 10rmb for 125g of yoğurt? You can buy a liter of Nestle milk for that much and despite not pursuing a Maths major, I’m pretty certain that will produce more than 125 grams of yoğurt!

So I took matters into my own hands, literally, and I have started to produce my own yoğurt. Yes, I run a little yoğurt operation in my backyard apartment. It’s really not that hard actually. When my mom first taught me how to make yoğurt at home, I just scoffed at the idea, partly because I couldn’t actually believe how easy it was. You take a small portion of left over yoğurt, slowly stir it into a pot of warm milk, and just cover it up with some blankets to keep it warm – and the magic happens. After several hours you can unwrap the blankets from the pot and put it into a fridge. Voila, you just gave birth to one of the miracles of life. Frankly, as a lazy/hip/straight 22 year old, I realize that producing yoğurt might not seem like the most ‘normal’ thing to do. But hey, that’s how I roll.

So that is the story of the most underrated edible susbstance in the world. Yoğurt  is already widely used for many different applications, but the majority of people haven’t even begun to understand the power of yoğurt. Not since microwavable pizza has the world seen a food so practical. Yoğurt might have been around for thousands of years, but amidst preformed misconceptions and prejudices, and a lack of media coverage - one of the real wonders of the world has continued to pass under the radar, until now. As they say, sometimes we are looking for something so intensely that we don’t realize that its been in front of us the whole time. So next time you wonder why your life is so bland, go ahead and cook yourself a fresh batch of yoğurt, you won’t be disappointed!   

The 1ππ0\/@Ŧ10π Crisis

Thursday, January 10th, 2008

innovation.jpg 

Innovation is a word that is used today in every imaginable way possible (no pun intended). It’s been a while since our world spent all of its resources and manpower on building up its militaries, engaging in war, and trying to suppress its colonies and own citizens. Yes, for the last several decades our brains have had a chance to focus on other areas such as entertainment, business, science, and technology. But as we have all too hastily discovered, innovation is fast running dry.

In no ration?

Let’s look today at the various fields that humans have taken a strong interest in.

Entertainment: Every passing year, you can see an increased number of film fans complaining about the lack of creativity. New sequels of old classics, adaptations of comic books, recycling of the same movie concepts (Ben Stiller as the innocent awkward geek put into funny situation, the same old romantic comedy which you can guess how it will end before the opening credits roll out, and a host of other formulas that people have seen time and again). While some of these end up being pretty decent such as Die Hard 4 and Sin City, you can’t help but notice that movie studios are fast running out of ideas.  

Business: If you have looked at any job postings recently, you will be hard pressed to find a position NOT requiring its candidate to be innovative. Not that I think these companies know what they exactly mean, but innovation is the hot word of the 21th century and they want a piece of that pie (several studies have indicated that 45-75% of all economic growth is directly attributed to innovation). From what I have witnessed in my short time in the business world is that companies aren’t so open to innovation as they think themselves to be. Change in any organization means costs and lots of costs ranging from; restructuring of organizations to new training methods to infrastructural costs to bring the change into place. Unless its broke, they wont fix it. So instead of huge changes such as the eradication of classical working hours, we have little TQM tools here and there that superficially gives corporations a feeling that they are in fact innovative.

Science: Still no cure for cancer, AIDS or most other serious illnesses. We did land on the moon some several decades ago but progress has been practically non-existent if you consider the grander scale of the universe. Einstein still stands as the most important scientific figure of all time, and perhaps one of the only know figures to the average public. Aside from the slow progress, grants and support for the scientific community is not nearly enough to expect any spectacular results in the near future.

Technology: Boy, will the people that have been stuck in a comma for the past several decades be disappointed when they wake up. If science-fiction movies are anything to go by, humans have long been expecting flying cars, time travel, and colonization of other planets.  Instead, the best thing we got right now is a phone with some extra features and TVs that can display 1080 lines of pixels instead of 480. Hardly groundbreaking stuff.

As we can see, almost all areas of interest to human beings are turning into saturated markets that no longer seem to be able to generate new ideas and products. This is in fact why innovation has become such an important word in the 21st century, constant innovation has become a requirement for entities wishing to stay ‘ahead of the curve’ – whether its a company, individual, or nation state. So what does the future look like then in this world where innovation is becoming not only more demanded, but also harder to supply. Is the situation really so bad?

Innovation Restriction 

First of all, I should state that I truly believe that innovation is limitless and infinite, therefore any scarcity of this so in-demand ‘resource’ is our fault and our fault only. I’ve heard it mentioned that creativity and innovation is not something you can teach, you are either born with it or not. I completely disagree to this analysis, and I believe that it is these types of predispositions that lead to our lack of innovation. However, the biggest clog towards innovation in our world is the infrastructure and the long ago built systems in place that secretly govern us. In past times this could have been governments and their autocratic leaders, but today it is increasingly becoming greedy corporations that prevent us from evolving at a faster and more socially desired way than naturally possible. Yes, those companies that seem to be leading the movement towards innovation are the exacts one restricting it – kind of like a Trojan horse full of carpenter ants .

-Energy: Oil is a scarce, over-relied on, and non eco-friendly chemical that is slowly leading to the destruction of our world. Solar-power, electricity, wind-power, and heaps of other innovations are there ready to be applied on to our polluted world. These are technologies that are in place and even becoming more economic solutions, but it will be some time before major oil companies, and their ‘friends’ in the government will let this happen.

-Software: While every praise should be given out to Bill Gates and Microsoft for their innovations that have deeply impacted this earth, they should in the same manner be criticized for unfairly ridding themselves of competition and keeping their technologies so much under wraps. You can’t really blame Bill, as his endeavours have led him to become one of the richest man on the earth, but it all becomes quite meaningless when you consider that he will be giving out 95% of his wealth to ‘help the world’. If he and other technological companies of those times embraced the idea of Open Source earlier, ‘the world’ might be a much better place already. Hopefully entities such as Google, Linux, Wikipedia can prove to be exemplary models that show sharing knowledge can benefit us all and ultimately lead to progress.

-Medicine:  It is a sad truth that it is profits that rule this world and not advancements that help humanity. How else do you explain companies not willing to help create this cheap cure for cancer? The foremost and easiest reaction is to think of these pharmaceutical companies as evil and conscious-less. However as true as that might be, there is naturally a thicker layer to this tragedy. 1)Providing research grants to this cause will lead them to Lose Weight Exercise/”>Lose Weight Exercise money. 2)Losing large amounts of money with no matching revenues will lead to unacceptable financial results. 3) The company will Lose Weight Exercise/”>Lose Weight Exercise money and employees will be cut to steer clear of bankruptcy. 4) Shareholders and the board will fire whoever was responsible for the mess and even more staff will be lost. So it is capitalism that should be blamed, if anything.

-Entertainment: Demand and supply are concepts that apply to the entertainment industry too, so you can’t blame entities for supplying that recycled garbage if there is an actual demand for it. So it is us as citizens that need to stop purchasing and hence supporting these unoriginal knock-offs. Yet is this really the only way movie studios will stop making these risk-free cash-cows? In our world yes. The music industry is facing such a serious situation today, yet they still aren’t wising up to the fact that they need to make some sort of changes to their current business model…suing its customers, giving them an inferior product in the form of DRM restricted tracks, and continuing to price products way over their costs is definitely not the way to go. As this article about the Pirate’s Dilemma points out, piracy in the end is forcing these industries to become more innovative and reinventing capitalism altogether. Let’s hope that piracy can, very ironically, prove to be the force that leads to more innovation.

-Technology: With Warner Bros. recently announcing its adoption of the Blu-Ray format, it has all but won the latest technology war over its nemesis HD-DVD. But anyone who has done research into the topic will realize that HD-DVD is the best format for the people: machines are cheaper, discs are cheaper, backwards compatible with DVDs, and more features that the Blu-Ray. However in our current capitalist system it is Sony’s Blu-Ray that won with rumoured buy-offs of around a half billion dollars for Warners Bros alone. Similarly, other movie studios sided with Blu-Ray because it was the better format protecting their‘intellectual property’. So in the end, a couple of large corporations decided a format war over the mass consumer base’s wishes and discouraged once again any innovators wishing to take on bigger and larger organizations.

– 

Yes it is an undeniable truth that these very same companies that appear to be leading the drive towards innovation are in fact the ones hindering it. With the industry and market firmly in their grasp, they can continue to deliver less than ideal products at the expense of consumers, and restrict those who wish to compete against them. Ironic, tragic, greedy, evil – all words that in someway describe this dark force that controls our future. But is our world really entrapped in this far less than ideal model with no way out? Was this the system we fought countless Wars of global magnitude to achieve? In this age where the largest companies have more power than most nations, where globalization and free trade are only increasing there economic and political clout – is there anything we can do to fight against this seemingly impenetrable stronghold? Innovation, in other words the progress of humankind and life in general, hangs in the very balance.

(to be continued in part 2…) 

Analyzing China and Turkey, Through a Shared Football Advert

Wednesday, January 9th, 2008

Serendipity in the Underground

On a slightly cold Sunday afternoon after a brief errand in the city, I happened to take a subway back home instead of the usual taxi ride I am accustomed to. As I was happily escaping the organized chaos that is the Shanghai subway, a huge poster was hung near the exit begging to catch my attention. I paused and looked at it for a second: 

adidassoccer.jpg

Yes it was one of those ads that is suppose to make your heart sink and make you all warm and fuzzy inside (especially for a nationalistic/sports loving/advertising appreciating/China residing person such as myself) but somehow it just didn’t affect me the way it should have. Walking home, I thought about why my reaction was as such: were the Chinese citizens portrayed in the exact manner that the world (and Chinese government) harshly views them – as a swarm of millions working hard just so that a few individuals can prosper? No, that wasn’t it. Instead it turned out that I had already seen this poster before…but there was no Adidas, and there was no China. Huh?

This Adidas advertising campaign had begun officially on November 30, 2007. On the other hand, the ad that had lit a fuse in my memory and no doubt was the creative ‘inspiration’ behind the Adidas campaign, had actually started months before - in the beginning of October. As you can see, the idea is…very much the same:

 

turkcellsupporters2.jpg

 

Upon returning home and trying to find out more about this shocking revelation, I noticed that the Adidas advertising campaign created by the TBWA advertising agency also included a video commercial apart from the prints. This again seemed like plagiarization of the video created by Markom Leo Burnett, the agency which prepared the Turkcell advert months before. See both adverts below:

Turkcell: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=isT4DXK0rag

Adidas: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cx0LP0pSm38

 

At the end of the day, whether TBWA or Adidas knew about the Turkcell/Markom Leo Burnett campaign before is irrelevant as they released an exact copy of a product 2 months too late. While the concept of the people of a country rallying behind their sports stars isn’t exactly groundbreaking, it is still interesting to see that what was meant to be the  ”largest campaign ever created by a single Adidas market” for the single most important sporting event for a country that is so eager to show itself in a positive light – to be in the end a complete copy. Luckily for the involved parties (China/TBWA/Adidas) this embarrassing news has not hit any mainstream news outlets, in fact it is hard to find ANY information on this quite amusing advertising fiasco.

Turkey vs China

One certainly positive aspect of this rather strange ‘sync of fate’ and one that I would like to focus on is the way in which the exact same idea was executed differently on two nations. This advertising coincidence serves to be a rather interesting light in which to analyze and compare Turkey and China. While Adidas had the bigger budget and hence ended up with a slightly more polished product, the print adverts themselves highlight key difference between the Chinese and Turkish people that explain frighteningly well these countries’ current sociopolitical framework.

These two seemingly opposite countries actually share a great deal of similarities: a great and tragic history that saw them go from world powers to the complete opposite until recently, a sense of nationalism that is not only widespread and relished but practically required, a culture that is as a rich as any, and a population that is in large part poor. However while the people of these nations face similar daily challenges on a day-to-day scale – the societies they constitute in fact hold much different roles and thoughts on their nations fate, and we can see this clearly when looking cLose Weight Exercise/”>Lose Weight Exercisely at the print ads.

China 

If you look cLose Weight Exercise/”>Lose Weight Exercisely at the China advert, the people are colored and detailed in a way to signify the lack of importance of each individual. It is more a sense of a large crowd that is begging to be portrayed, rather than a collection of individuals. In fact, you can notice that each and everyone in the crowd is hoping to give a helping hand but only a small percentage of the whole crowd is in fact of any use – the rest are ‘excess labour’ if you will. These individuals who aren’t of any help are all grouped into the same category and are faceless in the eyes of the observer. You can also see that each person that gets to help is exuberant in a reckless manner that implies that they are just happy to be there, regardless of what it is that they are actually doing (that is if they even know what they are doing).  The football star meanwhile is serious and focused solely on the goal at hand, due to the Chinese people and government’s strict expectation of success and the consequences of failure. However while the responsibility is solely on the star’s shoulders, the credit is also reserved for him and the Chinese ‘flag’  – he and the uniform of China are the only parts of the picture with any color.

What this reiterates is that China is not larger than the sum of its parts, it is in fact something totally different. While China is named ‘People’s Republic of China’, the nation and its destiny are controlled by the very few – the communist regime in place is likely to keep this structure in place as long as it possibly can. One last point of interest is that the picture sees no adversaries. While the fact that China has been isolated from the rest of the world until very recently is one way to explain this, it makes much more sense to think that China in fact sees no adversaries in sight at all. It is actually its very self that it needs to battle to succeed. The endless crowd of people that symbolizes China, is ironically also the ‘playing field’. This ‘match’ stretches all the way into the abyss, and this highlights that China has a long way to go before it can declare any sort of victory. 

Turkey 

When you look at the Turkey advert, you can see the approach is very different, and this is no coincidence. The ‘people’ are represented in much fewer amounts and it genuinely feels like each persons contribution is similar and actually noticeable to the overall goal. The faces of the Turkish supporters helping out are much more serious than their Chinese counterparts. Much like their superstar, the people understand their responsibility and the importance of what they are doing. Consequently, both supporters and the main star share size, color, and importance in the advert. This is no exaggeration as Turkish football supporters proudly view themselves as the 12th man in football games, and their effect is undeniable. 

The adversary in this advert is none other than ‘the West’. Turkey has struggled for decades to prove to the West that it is on equal footing with the rest of the advanced world. Funnily enough, much like its battles to join the European Union, the Turkish public tries here in this advert to ‘win’ through unfair means. Turkey still pushes today to be accepted into the EU despite the long list of EU regulations it has yet to meet. The setting of the advert is in an arena, where the rest of the world watches cLose Weight Exercise/”>Lose Weight Exercisely and the different media bodies in attendance can reflect the story in the manner they wish. Ultimately, it is satirically fitting that this advert – meant to signify the strong nationalism in Turkey where everyone not only wants success for the country but actively has a part in it -ends up showing that its people are doing the complete opposite of their intentions. Much like how going on the field and actually playing alongside the players would be a type of nationalism that would cost the team the game, the Turkish people’s overabundance and misdirected sense of nationalism in dealing with national issues also ends up clouding the future of economic and sociological development.

From Chance to Fate 

What started merely as a funny coincidence, ended up being quite a representative study on two of the most important yet relatively unknown nations in our modern world. Turkey on the one hand serves as the canvas of a modern Islamic country, the hope that East vs West, Islam vs Christianity, and nationalism vs globalization can all prosper in the same world. It’s people, slightly blinded by nationalism and overcharged on pride, struggle daily to contribute to the countries’ growth in anyway they can, even if it is rashly going on the football pitch and helping the motherland towards victory. China meanwhile, represents the future of the world, economic expansion, the final steps towards free trade, and a dormant giant ready to takeover the globe after centuries of isolationism. It’s people, are also blinded but for them it is communism that acts as the blinding powder. They are a country used to poverty and suppresion yet everyday have hope that their allmighty goverment can release the shackles from under their feet and provide them with a better life – and they will go to great lengths to allow a chance for this to happen, even if it is serving as the football mat under their star’s feet or standing cLose Weight Exercise/”>Lose Weight Exercise and ready at any chance their nation might need them. Steep hurdles are ahead for both these nations and its people, but let us not forget: impossible is nothing.

 

  

 

Comparing Athletes Across Generations

Tuesday, January 8th, 2008

bestest.jpg 

Anyone seen Rocky Balboa, the (hopefully) final movie in the classic Rocky story played by Sylvester Stallone?It’s the one where the current generation boxing champion is pitted in a virtual match against longtime retired Rocky Balboa using a sophisticated program designed by ESPN (got to be Hollinger) to determine who is the best of all time. Well such a program is fictional but the idea is certainly not. Sports fans across the world evaluate players from different generations on a regular basis. Borg or Federrer? Wilt or Shaq? Cruyf or Zidane? The list is endless, and the amount of friendly chatter this creates amongst fans is perhaps unparalleled anywhere else. One common tendency is for the older generation to prefer the older players, while the current batch of youngsters naturally side with the stars they grew up watching. Who is essentially right we will never know, and that is the actual beauty of the debate, but that doesn’t mean we can’t analyze this issue deeper to get some answers.

Innovator vs Adopter

One major mistake we make when debating the ‘greatest of all time’, is we take irrelevant factors into account. Take the area of phones. When it was first invented in the late 19th century, it was a breakthrough for the ages. In fact, it still stands today as one of the most remarkable inventions of all time. The ‘telephone’ that Alexander Bell had invented could enable two people in two remote locations to communicate. In the 19th centure this was a huge deal! However, if we talk about phones today the phone created by Apple and Steve Jobs (the iPhone – for those who just got out of a comma)  is far superior to the phone that Bell had created. So if you were to compare which is the better of the two phones, you would no doubt have to give the edge to the iPhone over whatever kind of device Bell could put together. This doesn’t mean that Jobs is a greater man than Bell, God no, but it does serve to be a good point in our sports debate.

So when you strictly want to debate who is the best of all time, make sure the debate doesn’t shift to non-relevant items like being an innovator or being a pioneer etc. If you ask someone the best phone of all time, I’m sure they wont tell you it is the phonograph that Bell used! Of course, if your debating about things such as who is the most ‘dominant’ or ‘brilliant’ player/scientist of all time then the debate changes. It all depends whether you try to make it a relative debate, or a comprehensive one. The fact that Dr. J was the first player to use high-flying moves doesn’t in fact make him a better player than the current player who learned through him and copied his style.

Evolution through Competition

Sports, like any other ‘industry’ in the world is an ever changing landscape where competition, money, and time force everyone involved in the industry to constantly evolve and try to improve. Even in the most ancient of industries where companies have been forever trying to dominate is seeing forward progress on a regular changes. Did you think people couple of centuries ago could envision toilets that you can sit on, automatically cleans itself, and can even massage your butt? Today you think toilets are a done deal but let me assure you, 100 years from now people will look back at us the same way we look at prehistoric caveman that ‘did their stuff’ in the woods like animals.

So for something very modern such as Sports, there is bound to be alot of changes and progress over time! Forget for a second the more recent sports, and consider a ‘sport’ that has been around since the beginning of time. Running. Below is the 100m world record progression over the last century or so in which records have been kept.

100m.bmp

Yes even in such a basic sport that humans have been trying to perfect since days of animal hunting homo sapiens, there has been notable consistent progress. So if we take a more complex and new sport such as basketball, then naturally we can expect much changes and progress over time. Not only are players/coaches/trainers becoming more experienced by learning from everything in the past, but the technological aspects, the tactics and strategies, the physical evolution are all progressing at rapid speeds. Of course, lets not forget that sports has gone from the hobby of the rich to a billions of dollar per year industry. With every young kid practicing and training to be the next rich athlete, there is bound to be a general level of progress in top proffesional leagues around the world (this old article I wrote, explains this further). 

50 years ago there wasn’t a single player with the physical gifts that someone such as LeBron James possessed when he came out of highschool! So while Bob Cousy remains a legendary basketball guard, and will continue to be looked up to by people throughout the ages - no one should argue that he is better than a current player today such as Stephon Marbury. The strength, speed, explosiveness, dribbling skills, moves, shooting range – all these are largely in favour of Stephon Marbury (current day laughingstock) over the clear cut basketball legend that is Bob Cousy. What this proves is that comparing players across time is simply unfair. What you do with what you got and what is around you is what SHOULD be the comparison we make. However, most often the debate is who is the best of all time and in such a debate, you need to take out the subjects from their respective environments and pit them straight up against each other.

The Past isn’t Forgotten

With all of that said, it doesn’t mean the greats of past times will inevitably be replaced by greater people in the near future. Look at Einstein, Da Vinci, Mozart, Ali, Shakespeare…these are all people that have stood the test of time and continue to not only be relevant but still stand as leaders in their respective fields – they came, they saw, they conquered. Perhaps they deserve even more credit for this achievement because if they accomplished all that they did in past times, imagine what they could do now with all the progress and better conditions that are available. Even if  past greats are ‘beaten’, they should and definitely do hold a special place in people’s minds. Everyone recognizes the fact that their respective colleagues before them are the reason why they are the way they are today. So perhaps one interesting dynamic that can be brought into the ‘best of all time’ debates that helps past players stand taller against the test of time, is that they should be given credit for the reason why the current player is better than him. So while Kobe is better than Dr. J today, it is only because Dr. J existed that Kobe is in fact better…. This is a rather counter-intuitive concept, yet it definitely can hold ground for you old timers out there who are resilient on giving up on the past. Whoever the winner of old versus young, past versus present – it is all of us who win in the end because everything is constantly changing (whether for better or for worse) and this makes life so much more interesting. Oh yea, and us young folks get to have something to chat about with our grandfathers!